RRC’s Ethics Reputation Ratings utilize an intuitive symbol
set that is intended to facilitate the markets’ understanding
of RRC’s ethics reputation rating system. At present, a total
of five rating levels exist: E1, E2, E3, E4, and E5, in descending order
of ethics reputation strength. Definitions of these rating levels are
set forth below.
A company’s ethics reputation that is rated E1
is of the highest quality and carries the smallest degree of risk of
ethics reputation default. Companies with ethics reputation ratings
in this category score highly across all ethics components from all
constituencies and are viewed as very solid and stable. Senior management
is perceived as highly ethical and as instilling a sense of ethical
behavior and rectitude that pervades all levels of the corporate hierarchy
and organizational culture. Companies whose ethics reputations are rated
E1 are able to deploy their perceived ethical strength
as a powerful advantage in areas such as strategic alliances, customer
and employee loyalty, and regulatory oversight. Companies with ethics
reputations in this rating category also benefit from extraordinary
support in times of controversy, are generally perceived as attractive
investments, and enjoy strong overall reputations among those familiar
with them.
A company’s ethics reputation that is rated E2
is of high quality and carries a small degree of risk of ethics reputation
default. Although companies with ethics reputation ratings in this category
possess many favorable ethics characteristics and score well across
most ethics components from most constituencies, fundamentals may suggest
some weakness, either in a single component or within a particular constituency.
A perception of corporate arrogance may, for example, cloud an otherwise
unblemished reputation. Companies with ethics reputation ratings in
this category receive a level of support in times of controversy that
is commensurate with the visibility of their efforts to remedy the situation,
but the depth and duration of such support are not unconditional. Companies
in this category may exhibit behavior that, left uncorrected, could
develop into an ethics vulnerability.
A company’s ethics reputation that is rated E3
is of medium quality and carries an average degree of risk of ethics
reputation default. Companies with ethics reputation ratings in this
category earn average scores on many ethics components or from many
constituencies, but may show significant weakness on several other components
or from several other constituencies. Companies whose ethics reputations
are rated E3 have only a limited ability to leverage
their ethics reputations to garner support in times of controversy.
A company’s ethics reputation that is rated E4
is of poor quality and carries a great degree of risk of ethics reputation
default. Companies with ethics reputation ratings in this category show
weakness across most or all ethics components and from most or all constituencies.
Companies whose ethics reputations are rated E4 are,
or are soon likely to be, in varying degrees of ethics reputation distress.
Ethics reputation rehabilitation is, however, still possible, provided
that affected companies take very public and sustained corrective measures
sufficient to rebuild the markets’ confidence in the ethical nature
of their conduct. No significant ethics reputational advantages accrue
to companies in this category, and no support in times of controversy
may reasonably be expected.
A company’s ethics reputation that is rated E5
is of the poorest quality and carries the greatest degree of risk of
ethics reputation default. Companies with ethics reputation ratings
in this category are in severe ethics reputation distress or have entered
outright ethics reputation default, but in either case have no reasonable
expectation of ethics reputation rehabilitation. Senior management is
perceived as highly unethical and as instilling a culture of unethical
behavior and irresponsibility that pervades all levels of the corporate
hierarchy and organizational culture. No ethics reputational advantages
whatsoever accrue to companies in this category. In fact, the ethics
reputations of these companies carry significant negative connotations.