:
Those elements of a company’s Ethics Reputation identified as
measurable and significant in a statistical analysis using the RRC Ethics
Reputation Model (see “Methodology”).
: An aggregation
of perceptions among third parties of the extent to which a company’s
behavior along the dimension of business ethics is considered admirable,
average, or egregious.
:
Derived, using the RRC Ethics Reputation Model, from the responses of
senior industry executives surveyed. The score reflects the sum of perceptions
of a company’s performance on key ethics components.
:
The rating assigned to a company’s Ethics Reputation by RRC’s
Ethics Rating Committee on the basis of its analysis and weighting of,
among other sources, the company’s Ethics Reputation Score, the
information provided by the surveys of senior industry executives and
financial analysts, analysis of business and financial media, and the
opinions expressed by RRC’s industry experts.
:
Describes a state in which a company is perceived to have significant
deficiencies in its Ethics Reputation that it is, or should be, attempting
to correct. These deficiencies may result from one or more issues (e.g.,
financial or regulatory problems, product recalls, public relations
debacles) that are symptomatic of fundamentally flawed business ethics,
endemic failures in operational execution, and/or poor judgment on the
part of key management. A company in this state of distress has ruptured
or at least weakened basic elements of the public trust underpinning
the company’s perception as an ethical corporate citizen, but
not so irreversibly as to preclude it from any possibility of ethics
reputation rehabilitation. The future of a company in this state rests
squarely in the hands of its senior management. If management fails
promptly and decisively to root out and remedy both the corporate behavior
directly responsible for so endangering the company’s Ethics Reputation
and the underlying corporate culture that sustains such behavior, it
is highly likely that the company will be subject to significantly increased
public scrutiny and legal and regulatory risk. A company experiencing
severe ethics reputation distress is in serious jeopardy of a debilitating
erosion of confidence in the firm among significant stakeholders (e.g.,
customers, suppliers, shareholders, employees) and the public at large.
A company in this state may expect an Ethics Reputation Rating of E4
or E5, depending on the severity of its ethics reputation distress.
:
Describes a state in which a company is perceived to have grossly violated
the trust of significant stakeholders (e.g., customers, suppliers, shareholders,
employees) and the public at large, thereby demonstrating, through its
actions and those of its senior management, that promises and undertakings
made to these constituencies are perceived to be of little or no value.
A company in a state of ethics reputation default is so perceived to
have flagrantly abrogated its ethical obligations to these constituencies
that it is highly unlikely that it will ever be able to recapture even
a modicum of their trust or respect. A company suffering from ethics
reputation default may continue operations for some period as it atrophies
at its core and eventually disintegrates, but such external appearances
should not mask its failure to remain a viable business concern going
forward. Companies in ethics reputation default have no reasonable expectation
of ethics reputation rehabilitation. A company in this state will bear
an Ethics Reputation Rating of E5, the lowest rating level assigned.
: Rating Research LLC.